Purpose-built for immigration psychological evaluations
One report. Five jobs.One workflow.
Foresica is the platform of defensibility for immigration psychological evaluations. It brings first contact, evidence capture, clinician-reviewed drafting, structured QA, signature, and secure attorney delivery into one reviewable record.
Foresica organizes the work. The licensed clinician decides, edits, and signs every material conclusion.
The Foresica standard
The platform of defensibility for immigration evaluations.
Foresica is not a general-purpose AI writer that happens to support immigration. It is built around the clinical, documentary, attorney, and delivery workflow of an immigration psychological evaluation.
The goal is not to manufacture certainty. It is to make the work reviewable: what the record says, what requires clinical judgment, what needs more documentation, and what exact report was ultimately signed.
What the work demands
A defensible report is more than a generated document.
It is a clinical document whose sources, decisions, limits, signature, and delivery path can be accounted for.
The record has to stay coherent
Names, dates, countries, relationships, case type, and records reviewed must agree before a report carries your name.
Clinical claims need a basis
A score, symptom, diagnosis, or functional limitation cannot simply sound persuasive. It needs an accountable source in the case record.
The clinical and legal lanes differ
Immigration reports need rigorous clinical reasoning without crossing into credibility findings or legal conclusions.
Delivery is part of defensibility
The report must be signed, verifiable, and delivered to counsel through a controlled path — not passed around in an email thread.
Evidence trail
Drafting that shows its basis.
Foresica makes a proposed sentence, its source material, and the clinician’s next decision visible in the same review flow.
Proposed report language
“The evaluation record documents symptoms and functional concerns that the clinician reviews in relation to the interview, available records, and recorded measures.”
Clinician review
The clinician can edit the wording, request more documentation, connect the sentence to a stronger basis, or reject it. Foresica does not make the final clinical conclusion.
The example is illustrative only. It is not diagnostic language, a clinical recommendation, or a legal opinion.
One report. Five jobs. One workflow.
From first contact to counsel delivery.
Each stage makes clear what the platform handles and where clinical responsibility remains with the evaluator.
Practice
Capture the case
Bring intake, source documents, session material, and structured assessments into one case record.
Clinician
Confirm what is known
Establish the Golden Record for verified case details, case type, and meaningful dates.
Foresica
Build the evaluation
Draft structured sections in your forensic voice, with evidence anchored in the real record.
Clinician
Resolve defensibility issues
Review source gaps, scope-sensitive language, consistency issues, and documented next actions.
Attorney
Sign and deliver securely
Freeze the exact report you approved and share it with counsel through a controlled attorney portal.
The same case record supports the draft, review trail, signed report, and controlled delivery path.
The complete case record
Your work does not end when the draft is done.
Foresica connects the clinical work, the report record, and the delivery path to counsel without forcing a team to stitch together separate tools.
Telehealth in the same record
Sessions, live transcription, clinician notes, and follow-up actions stay connected to the evaluation they support.
Drafting that remains yours
Foresica can propose structure and language; the clinician reviews, edits, accepts, and signs every material conclusion.
Assessments with accountable scores
Structured instruments use server-owned scoring and clear bands, while the clinician retains judgment over their clinical meaning.
Evidence that can be traced
Findings and draft language stay connected to the session material or document evidence that supports them.
A report that can be verified
REB-Sign seals the approved report with a fingerprint, verification ID, signer attribution, and access-aware audit trail.
A secure path to counsel
Give attorneys a controlled portal for signed reports and intentionally shared documents, with expiration, revocation, and activity visibility.
Forensic QA, made accountable
QA that respects the boundary of clinical judgment.
Foresica can identify questions for review, show their source context, and keep unresolved issues visible. It does not determine credibility, legal strategy, or the final clinical conclusion.
- Identity, timeline, country, relationship, and case-type consistency
- Clinical claims that need stronger source support before a clinician can stand behind them
- Instrument scores and severity language that must agree with documented responses
- Diagnostic, symptom, treatment, and functional-impact consistency across the record
- Immigration-forensic scope: clinical findings stay distinct from legal conclusions and credibility determinations
- Missing clinical evidence, documented limitations, and concrete next actions for the evaluator
- Source-aware rewriting suggestions — proposed for review, never applied as clinical fact
What remains with the clinician
Judgment is not a checkbox.
- Diagnostic formulation and the interpretation of clinical material
- Validity determinations and how limitations should be described
- Credibility and legal conclusions, which are not Foresica’s role
- The decision to sign, release, or hold a report
Practice controls & data handling
Trust is a record, not a badge.
Immigration evaluations carry clinical, legal, and personal records. Foresica gives practices a concrete way to review access, delivery activity, signatures, and data-handling questions in the same operating environment.
Security and BAA documentation are addressed during practice onboarding so your organization can review the current scope with the right people. The public security page and disclosure address are at /security.
- Practice-scoped access, roles, and case-level permissions
- Encrypted transport and protected clinical records
- Case access and delivery activity that can be audited
- Tamper-evident report signatures and verification records
- BAA documentation available during practice onboarding
- Human clinical review before every signed report
Built inside the work
A platform shaped by immigration evaluation practice.
Foresica grew inside REB Human Services, where Ryan E. Bates, M.Ed., LMHC, and Farrah Boyd have been developing immigration psychological evaluation workflows since 2021.
The product standard is simple: preserve the source, keep clinical judgment with the clinician, record the signature decision, and create a controlled handoff to counsel.
Start with the work in front of you
A complete platform, without a fragmented workflow.
Choose the access model that fits your practice, whether you are beginning with one evaluation or creating shared capacity for a team.
Practice onboarding · Report capacity · Team access
Foresica consolidates the workflow around the evaluation itself: intake, evidence, drafting, quality review, signature, and controlled attorney delivery.
Access
$99 per report. The whole report.
Review-only tools charge $39–49 to check a report you already spent 10–20 hours writing. Foresica is the 10–20 hours.
Every Foresica report includes the four phases:
Evidence — live session capture, transcription per speaker, instruments scored by rules, never by AI.
Draft — Smart Draft composes in your clinical voice; every factual sentence carries its source: quote, timestamp, session.
Review — clinical language check, case-type protocol, defensibility; proposed as tracked changes you accept or reject.
Sign — seal with a hash-chained chain of custody; share with counsel in one click; verifiable by anyone, readable by no one else.
Reports never expire.
Each pack covers that many complete evaluations. Reports never expire. Nonprofits and enterprise teams: talk to us.
Why not $49?
$49 buys a second opinion on a finished report. $99 buys the report: captured, composed, sourced sentence by sentence, reviewed and sealed.
Included in every report
No feature tiers. Full platform every time.
- Full AI-assisted clinical draft
- Evidence desk & structured review
- REB-Sign tamper-evident signature
- Secure attorney portal delivery
- Audit trail & access log
Not satisfied? Contact us within 15 days of purchase for a full refund on unused credits.
Report credits are valid indefinitely and apply to any supported case type — asylum, VAWA, U-visa, hardship. Refund requests accepted within 15 days of purchase for unused credits. See our Terms of Service.
FAQ
Questions, answered
Who is Foresica for?+
Foresica is purpose-built for clinicians and practices conducting immigration psychological evaluations, from solo evaluators to multi-clinician organizations.
Does Foresica replace the clinician's judgment?+
No. Foresica drafts each section with every finding tied to its basis in the record; the licensed clinician reviews, edits, and signs. Clinical judgment always stays with the clinician, and the output is built for structured human review — never automatic filing.
How do security and BAA documentation work?+
Foresica provides technical safeguards such as access controls, encrypted transport, audit visibility, and protected report delivery. BAA documentation is available during practice onboarding. Each practice remains responsible for its own policies, configuration, and applicable agreements. The public security page is at /security.
How does Foresica use AI safely?+
Foresica proposes a structured draft based on the material in the case record. It does not replace the clinician’s judgment, automatically sign a report, or turn an inference into a clinical fact. You review, edit, and sign every report.
Are REB-Sign electronic signatures legally valid?+
REB-Sign is built around U.S. e-signature law — the federal ESIGN Act and state UETA. When you sign, it captures your intent to sign, your consent to sign electronically, attribution to your authenticated account, a tamper-evident fingerprint of the exact report, and a timestamped audit entry. As with any electronic signature, ultimate admissibility in a given proceeding is determined by the court and your counsel.
See the workflow your practice can stand behind.
Bring the record, the clinician’s judgment, the signature, and the attorney delivery path into one reviewable system for immigration psychological evaluations.